ST. LOUIS — The former superintendent of St. Louis Public Schools who remains under investigation by the district has started a new career as an entrepreneur.
Keisha Scarlett said Monday she is the founder and CEO of Woven Consulting, . Her location on the networking site is still listed as St. Louis, and her post is accompanied by a photo of her posing downtown on North 11th Street with the Thomas Eagleton Federal Courthouse in the background.
Scarlett, 50, was fired in September after serving one year as superintendent of SLPS amid questions about her spending and hiring practices, including jobs and contracts for more than a dozen colleagues connected to her previous job with Seattle Public Schools.
“Just as my superintendent journey started with courage and faith, my journey as an entrepreneur begins with the same,†Scarlett wrote online. “This new venture is an opportunity to live out my core values — authenticity, faith, and joy — while continuing to make an impact.â€
People are also reading…
Woven, which she spells in capital letters with a backward “E,†is a business consulting firm and “Your trust partner in cultivating leadership excellence, fostering innovation, and driving meaningful change,†according to its . No record of a company with that name was listed online Monday by either the ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ or Washington offices of the secretary of state.
Scarlett said leading SLPS “was one of the most rewarding and meaningful experiences of my life. I loved being a superintendent. To me, it’s the greatest job on the planet.â€
A third-party investigation of Scarlett’s tenure is expected to wrap up by Dec. 10, a district spokesman said Friday after a closed session school board meeting.
Scarlett has said she plans to sue SLPS for wrongful termination in part because the school board has blocked her from defending herself.
The board responded last week with a statement saying they will “vigorously defend the careful and meticulous process it undertook to place Dr. Scarlett on leave with pay, to investigate the allegations against her, and to reach the decision to terminate her employment.â€